HUBBARD’S ANGEL INSECT

By Arthur V. Evans

My step-son Graham Wilson and I drove out to the VCU Rice Center in Charles City County, Virginia this morning in search of insects to photograph. By late morning, the temperature was in the high 50’s and the only insect seen on the wing was a single mourning cloak. Undaunted, I began searching for snags and logs with loose bark.

With Graham looking on, I slowly peeled back a slab of bark from a large fallen oak. I soon caught a glimpse of several tiny, pale insects less than 1/8 inch (2.0-3.0 mm) long as they scurried about the smooth, moist patch of exposed wood. I immediately recognized the wingless, termite-like animals as angel insects, or zorapterans. They quickly scrambled to find a dark nook or cranny to escape the sudden invasion of light.

Hubbard's angel insect, Zorotypus hubbardi, is one of two species of zorapterans found in the United States.

Angel insects are not rare and are sometimes quite abundant locally. They simply escape attention because they are small, secretive, and easily overlooked. Adults are most active in spring and summer and are typically found in deciduous woodlands. Here in Virginia, I usually find them under the bark of rotten logs, often in association with moist accumulations of termite frass.

The order Zoraptera was proposed in 1913 by the Italian entomologist Filippo Silvestri. The name of the order is derived from the Greek words zoros (sheer or pure), a, without, and pteros (wing); winged zorapterans were discovered after the name of the order was proposed. Of the 32 species of angel insects known worldwide, most are tropical. Only two are found in the United States: Hubbard’s angel insect, Zorotypus hubbardi Caudell (eastern United States) and Snyder’s angel insect, Z. snyderi Caudell (southern Florida).

Hubbard’s angel insects are gregarious and live in small groups; isolated individuals are incapable of surviving for very long on their own. They are usually found under the bark of rotting logs, where they eat fungus, especially spores and the branching, threadlike fungal structures known as hyphae. Dead nematodes, mites, small insects and other minute arthropods are also scavenged when there is an opportunity. In the laboratory, angel insects thrive on a diet of yeast and crushed rat chow, as well as their own remains.

Angel insects spend much of their time grooming themselves or each other. They reproduce sexually or by parthenogenesis. Before mating, males court females by offering them droplets of fluid secreted by a special gland on their head. Receptive females mate for several days with the same or different partners. Soon they will lay batches of eggs, cover them with chewed bits of food, and watch over them for several weeks until they hatch. The larvae resemble small versions of the adults and molt four or five times before reaching maturity. The larvae are distinguished from the adults by their smaller size and eight-segmented antennae.

Most angel insects are pale, wingless, and blind. Their eyeless, triangular heads are equipped with chewing mouthparts. Adults have pair of antennae with nine bead-like segments. Their hind legs are equipped with bulging thighs armed with a row of small, sharp spines underneath. All six zorapteran feet are two-segmented, the first of which is very short.

Tough times as a result of overcrowding or dwindling food supplies trigger the production of eyed and winged males and females that soon take to the air in search of better living conditions. Their four transparent wings resemble narrow paddles and have few supporting veins. Although similar in shape, the forewings are distinctly longer than the hindwings. Zorapterans are often attracted to lights on warm nights. Like termites, they shed their wings easily upon entering a new log, leaving only four small stubs behind.

Zorapterans have stumped systematic entomologists for years in terms of trying to sort out their relationships with other insects. Unfortunately, their currently sparse fossil record has yet to shed any light on the subject. Originally considered the nearest relative of termites, zorapterans have since been allied with termites + cockroaches, earwigs, earwigs + cockroaches + mantids, thrips, or barklice.  Currently, they are considered as closely allied with another curious group of insects, the webspinners (Embioptera).

© 2010, A.V. Evans

15 Responses to “HUBBARD’S ANGEL INSECT”

  1. Fantastic, Art! I’ve never seen a Zorapteran.

    • Arthur Evans Says:

      Thanks Alex! If only I had your lenses and diffusers!

      Arthur V. Evans, D.Sc.

      1600 Nottoway Ave. Richmond, VA 23227 804.264.0488 arthurevans@verizon.net

      Research Associate:

      Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC Virginia Museum of Natural History, Martinsville, VA Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA

      What’s Bugging You? https://arthurevans.wordpress.com

      Checklist of the New World Chafers http://www.museum.unl.edu/research/entomology/SSSA/nwmelos.htm

      Become a fan of “Dr. Art Evans, entomologist” on Facebook to find out about upcoming lectures, books, and other insect events

      • Shouldn’t be hard to replicate my diffusers, at least. They’re all made out of stray tracing paper, tape, and miscellaneous office supplies. I don’t think I’ve spent more than a couple dollars on diffusion…

      • Arthur Evans Says:

        Actually, I do have diffusers that Chris Wirth put together for me based on your design. using tracing paper. This set up has really made a difference with my photography!

      • Respected Sir, i have to give a presentation on Zoraptera and im glad that i found this website, got a lot of information but im unable to understand the reason why Zorapterans are also called angel insects?? Please help me.
        Thanking you
        Yours sincerely
        Corrie

      • Good question Corrie!

        I am not exactly sure, but it might have something to do with the Greek origin of the order name, Zoraptera. According to my sources, the Greek word ‘zoros’ means pure and this may be the source for the common name ‘angel insect.’ I’ll let you know if I find out something more on this subject.

        When are you giving your presentation?

      • Thank you so much Sir, for your time and patience to reply me. Guess i might tell the same answer if anyone questions me this.
        Thanking You
        Yours sincerely
        Corrie

  2. This was a great discovery! Please come back and visit VCU’s Rice Center again!

  3. Art~
    Thanks for a very informative article concerning the Zoraptera in the U.S.

    Back in 1957, when still a grad student, I searched without any luck for Zorotypus hubbardi with George W. Byers (Diptera:Tipulidae; Mecoptera) and William L. Peters (Ephemeroptera). I looked in piles of wood shavings, but found none of these wee creatures. I’ll look under logs at the very next opportunity.

    Your Blog is outstanding as are your texts and I can see revisiting it many times.

    Thanks for sharing your experiences and knowledge with the rest of us in the blogospheric ether.

    Saul I.Frommer

    • Arthur Evans Says:

      Thanks Saul! I started seeing zorapterans right away here in Richmond, but never gave them much thought, much less confirmed their identity. My interest in photography and popular writing has inspired me to pay closer attention to many of the multi-legged critters that I have ignored for so long!

  4. […] Insect of the week – number 29 Photo credit: Arthur Evans […]

  5. Matt Bertone Says:

    Hi Art,
    Great post and photo! I just wanted to clarify that the translation of the name is a little off, as it should have the “-a” before -pteron, meaning without; thus they were once believed to be “purely without wings”.
    Matt

  6. Kim Egginton Says:

    This wonderful photo of the zorapteran is a rather rare find! I would dearly like permission to include it in an educational video for young children about insects…with credit, of course. It will represent the letter Z in our insect alphabet song–and it’s the last image I need…

Leave a comment